Microsoft's search engine Bing is still serving child porn, according to an online safety startup, which said certain search terms on the platform brought up child porn images and related keywords. This is not the first time Bing has been spotted serving up the illegal content, with a report from January this year highlighting the issue.
The news comes as part of a report in The New York Times that looks at what the newspaper says is a failure by tech companies to adequately address child pornography on their platforms," CNET reported on Saturday. The tech giant has long been at the forefront of combating abuse imagery, even creating a detection tool called "PhotoDNA" almost a decade ago. But many criminals have turned to its search engine Bing as a reliable tool.
As we mentioned, this is not the first time that Microsoft's Bing search engine has been caught serving child porn to its users. To recall, earlier this year, Bing was caught serving images portraying child pornography in search results and even suggested keywords that could be used to find more disturbing content whose possession or distribution is deemed a criminal offence. The January findings were reported by AntiToxin, an organisation which builds solutions to combat online abuse, after an anonymous tip received by TechCrunch highlighted how easy it was to find such images - which are banned across multiple platforms - on Bing.
For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. Further reading: BingMicrosoft. Tech News in Hindi. More Technology News in Hindi. Latest Videos. More Videos. Popular Mobiles. Listen to the latest songsonly on JioSaavn.Inline linking also known as hotlinkingleechingpiggy-backingdirect linkingoffsite image grabs is the use of a linked object, often an image, on one site by a web page belonging to a second site. One site is said to have an inline link to the other site where the object is located.
Resources may be located on any server at any location. When a web site is visited, the browser first downloads the textual content in the form of an HTML document. When a browser downloads an HTML page containing such an image, the browser will contact the remote server to request the image content.
The ability to display content from one site within another is part of the original design of the Web's hypertext medium. Common uses include:. The blurring of boundaries between sites can lead to other problems when the site violates users' expectations. Other times, inline linking can be done for malicious purposes.
Most web browsers will blindly follow the URL for inline links, even though it is a frequent security complaint. Many ad filtering browser tools will restrict this behavior to varying degrees. Some servers are programmed to use the HTTP referer header to detect hotlinking and return a condemnatory message, commonly in the same format, in place of the expected image or media clip.
Most servers can be configured to partially protect hosted media from inline linking, usually by not serving the media or by serving a different file. URL rewriting is often used e. Most types of electronic media can be redirected this way, including video files, music files, and animations such as Flash. Other solutions usually combine URL rewriting with some custom complex server side scripting to allow hotlinking for a short time, or in more complex setups, to allow the hotlinking but return an alternative image with reduced quality and size and thus reduce the bandwidth load when requested from a remote server.
All hotlink prevention measures risk deteriorating the user experience on the third-party website. The most significant legal fact about inline linking, relative to copyright law considerations, is that the inline linker does not place a copy of the image file on its own Internet server. Rather, the inline linker places a pointer on its Internet server that points to the server on which the proprietor of the image has placed the image file.
This pointer causes a user's browser to jump to the proprietor's server and fetch the image file to the user's computer. US courts have considered this a decisive fact in copyright analysis. Thus, in Perfect 10, Inc. Google does not Providing these HTML instructions is not equivalent to showing a copy. First, the HTML instructions are lines of text, not a photographic image. The browser then interacts with the computer that stores the infringing image.
While in-line linking and framing may cause some computer users to believe they are viewing a single Google webpage, the Copyright Act From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For the Malaysian prepaid mobile service, see Maxis Communications. For the spicy type of sausage, see Hot link sausage. This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
Learn how and when to remove these template messages. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the talk page. March In the context of the World Wide Webdeep linking is the use of a hyperlink that links to a specific, generally searchable or indexed, piece of web content on a website e.
The URL contains all the information needed to point to a particular item. The technology behind the World Wide Web, the Hypertext Transfer Protocol HTTPdoes not actually make any distinction between "deep" links and any other links—all links are functionally equal. This is intentional; one of the design purposes of the Web is to allow authors to link to any published document on another site. The possibility of so-called "deep" linking is therefore built into the Web technology of HTTP and URLs by default—while a site can attempt to restrict deep links, to do so requires extra effort.Acessando a DeepWeb e a DarkNet com TOR
According to the World Wide Web Consortium Technical Architecture Group, "any attempt to forbid the practice of deep linking is based on a misunderstanding of the technology, and threatens to undermine the functioning of the Web as a whole". Some commercial websites object to other sites making deep links into their content either because it bypasses advertising on their main pages, passes off their content as that of the linker or, like The Wall Street Journalthey charge users for permanently valid links.
Sometimes, deep linking has led to legal action such as in the case of Ticketmaster versus Microsoftwhere Microsoft deep-linked to Ticketmaster's site from its Sidewalk service.
This case was settled when Microsoft and Ticketmaster arranged a licensing agreement. Ticketmaster later filed a similar case against Tickets. There is nothing sufficiently original to make the URL a copyrightable item, especially the way it is used.
There appear to be no cases holding the URLs to be subject to copyright. On principle, they should not be.
This can cause usability problems for visitors to those sites. For example, they may be unable to save bookmarks to individual pages or states of the site, use the web browser forward and back buttons—and clicking the browser refresh button may return the user to the initial page.
However, this is not a fundamental limitation of these technologies. Probably the earliest legal case arising out of deep linking was the Scottish case of The Shetland Times vs. The Shetland Newsin which the Times accused the News of appropriating stories on the Times ' website as its own.
At the beginning ofin a case between the search engine Bixee. The most important and widely cited U. Arriba Soft Corp. In the second of these cases, the court explained speaking of defendant Google, whom Perfect 10 had also sued why linking is not a copyright infringement under US law:. Google does not…display a copy of full-size infringing photographic images for purposes of the Copyright Act when Google frames in-line linked images that appear on a user's computer screen.
Because Google's computers do not store the photographic images, Google does not have a copy of the images for purposes of the Copyright Act. In other words, Google does not have any "material objects…in which a work is fixed…and from which the work can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated" and thus cannot communicate a copy. Instead of communicating a copy of the image, Google provides HTML instructions that direct a user's browser to a website publisher's computer that stores the full-size photographic image.
Providing these HTML instructions is not equivalent to showing a copy. First, the HTML instructions are lines of text, not a photographic image. Second, HTML instructions do not themselves cause infringing images to appear on the user's computer screen. The HTML merely gives the address of the image to the user's browser.Launched by Christopher "moot" Poole in October4chan hosts boards dedicated to a wide variety of topics, from anime and manga to video games, music, literature, fitness, politics, and sports, among others.
The site was created as a counterpart to the Japanese imageboard Futaba Channelalso known as 2chan,  and the first boards were created for posting images and discussion related to anime.
The Guardian once summarized the 4chan community as "lunatic, juvenile The majority of posting on 4chan takes place on imageboardswhere users have the ability to share images and create threaded discussions. Each board has its own set of rules and is dedicated to a specific topic, variously including anime and manga, video games, music, literature, fitness, politics, and sports, among others. Poole has acknowledged that donations alone could not keep the site online, and turned to advertising to help make ends meet.
Unlike most web forums, 4chan does not have a registration system, allowing users to post anonymously. A "capcode" may be used to attribute the post to "Anonymous Mod", although moderators often post without the capcode. Revealing oneself as a janitor is grounds for immediate dismissal. For instance, on December 28,4chan and other websites went down due to such an attack, following which Poole said on his blog, "We now join the ranks of MasterCardVisaPayPalet al.
The site was launched as 4chan. On March 1,Poole announced that he lacked the funds to pay the month's server bill, but was able to continue operations after receiving a swarm of donations from users.
By November4chan made the transition to utilizing Cloudflare following a series of DDoS attacks. On January 21,Poole stepped down as the site's administrator, citing stress from controversies such as Gamergate as the reason for his departure. In Octoberit was reported that the site was facing financial difficulties that could lead to its closure or radical changes.
But I failed. I am sincerely sorry", citing server costs, infrastructure costs, and network fees. On November 17,it was announced that the site would be split into two, with the work-safe boards moved to a new domain, 4channel. In a series of posts on the topic, Nishimura explained that the split was due to 4chan being blacklisted by most advertising companies, and that the new 4channel domain would allow for the site to receive advertisements by mainstream ad providers.
Poole kept his real-life identity hidden until it was revealed on July 9,in The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, he had used the alias "moot". In AprilPoole was voted the world's most influential person of by an open Internet poll conducted by Time magazine. On September 12,Poole gave a talk on why 4chan has a reputation as a "Meme Factory" at the Paraflows Symposium in Vienna, Austriawhich was part of the Paraflows 09 festival, themed Urban Hacking.
In this talk, Poole mainly attributed this to the anonymous system, and to the lack of data retention on the site "The site has no memory. David Kernell as a government witness. He also explained to the court the nature of the data given to the FBI as part of the search warrantincluding how users can be uniquely identified from site audit logs. A stickied thread on its front page states that the board's intended purpose is "discussion of news, world events, political issues, and other related topics.
Both Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr. The "no rules" policy also applies to actions of administrators and moderators, which means that users may be banned at any time, for any reason, including for no reason at all. Each post is assigned a post number. Certain post numbers are sought after with a large amount of posting taking place to "GET" them. A "GET" occurs when a post's number ends in a special number, such as, or every millionth post.
Many early memes that originated at 4chan have gained media attention. A lolcat is an image combining a photograph of a cat with text intended to contribute humour. The text is often idiosyncratic and grammatically incorrect. Inthe meme was widely popularized by 4chan in the form of "Caturday".Last Updated: September 25, References.
This article was written by Jack Lloyd. He has over two years of experience writing and editing technology-related articles. He is technology enthusiast and an English teacher. This article has been viewedtimes. This wikiHow teaches you how to access Deep Web data, which is online information that's impossible to find with a standard search engine such as Google or Bing. It also covers how to access the Dark Web, which is a controversial and difficult-to-access subset of the Deep Web.
Connect to a VPN. Download and install Tor. Connect to Tor. Access a Deep or Dark Web search engine e. Torch, DuckDuckGo, notEvil. Search for subjects and keywords. Did this summary help you? Yes No.
Please help us continue to provide you with our trusted how-to guides and videos for free by whitelisting wikiHow on your ad blocker. Log in Facebook. No account yet? Create an account.
In an interview with Kotakuthe channel's owner claims to have downloaded the game from a Tor hidden service after receiving a tip from an anonymous subscriber.
The subscriber in turn claims to have found the link via a deep web internet forum, from a user only known as "ZK"  Initially, some followers were skeptical of the game, fearing it may contain gore or child pornography.
However, the owner of Obscure Horror Corner shared that, so far in his playthroughs, the game had not contained any such material. Three days later, another interview with the Obscure Horror Corner owner appeared on Kotaku, claiming that the link was purposefully given in error since the game itself did in fact contain such graphic material and the Obscure Horror Corner channel owner did not want to be responsible for disseminating such material.
In an update to the Kotaku article, Patricia Hernandez states:. I should have presented the tale of its discovery with more skepticism.
I apologize for that. While the original article admits that the game exists in a more mythical state than a tangible one, it could have gone farther to make clear what was concrete about Jamie's tale and what wasn't. Minutes before the update, a new version of the game was posted to 4chan by someone claiming to be ZK, claiming that Obscure Horror Corner had not been showing their viewers the "true" Sad Satan. Some users complained that their computers began running sluggishly, and a few even reported that their computers became completely unresponsive while trying to run the game.
A few users even reported that their computers would not turn on anymore after running this version of the game. Later, when this user tried to boot up his computer, the computer failed to start up normally. Ina man from Lubbock, Texas named Gary Graves was arrested on counts of child pornography possession, he ran a YouTube channel Scarebere which had posted a video titled Sad Sad Satan.
The YouTube channel in question can be traced back to a Reddit account that was created 4 days before the post containing the link to the "clone" was posted on 4chanthe Reddit account that was created was ScarebereZK.
Another video found on the channel also showed a middle aged man, the credits in the video identified him as Gary Graves. The man in the video is identical to another Gary found in the Lubbock criminal registry; which led some to assume that Gary was indeed the creator and poster of the "clone" game. Sad Satan was the last game covered by Obscure Horror Cornerand since then, the YouTube channel has been abandoned for unknown reasons.
There has been speculation that the game was in fact created by the owner of Obscure Horror Corner in an effort to increase viewer subscription count, and that the Deep Web story was a complete fabrication to give the whole account more intrigue.
It is also possible that Sad Satan was not created by the owner of Obscure Horror Cornerand that in truth, the owner of the channel decided to go into hiding because of all the controversy after the malware version of Sad Satan was released. The original game posted by Obscure Horror Corner features walking down monochromatic corridors while various audio samples are played and looped over each other.
Audio in the game leans heavily on recordings of interviews with various murderers, such as Charles Manson. The game also depends heavily on distorted or reversed audio of such interviews or musical clips, such as the song I love Beijing Tiananmenplayed in the beginning.
Reversed clips from the Swedish Rhapsody numbers station can also be heard. While the player controls their character through the hallways, images may intermittently display, taking up the entire screen and preventing the player from progressing any further until the image automatically closes a few seconds later. Most of the images seem to reference child abuseespecially people indicted in Operation Yewtreesuch as images of Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris.
Other images revolve around crime, and include people convicted or accused of murder such as Japanese child murderer, cannibal, rapist and necrophile Tsutomu Miyazaki.
Images of accident victims and murder victims are also shown, including the aftermath of a person struck by a truck, and a beheading. Additionally, at least one version of the game contains an image related to the case of Corinne Danielle Motley, a Florida woman who was arrested for producing child pornographythe image being a screencap from a video that led to her arrest.
That particular version also contained a virus that caused a wide range of negative effects, from causing the infected computer to become sluggish to a permanent shutdown, once the executable was run.
The only other "characters" in the game are children who simply stand in one place and do not move or interact with the player at all. In the final video posted by Obscure Horror Cornerone of these children does begin to follow the player, causing "contact damage". Since the player has no means of self-defense or any ability to heal damage, the player will inevitably die at this point in the game.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Computer game. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources.In copyright lawthe legal status of hyperlinking also termed " linking " and that of framing concern how courts address two different but related Web technologies.
In large part, the legal issues concern use of these technologies to create or facilitate public access to proprietary media content — such as portions of commercial Web sites. When hyperlinking and framing have the effect of distributing, and creating routes for the distribution of content information that does not come from the proprietors of the Web pages affected by these practices, the proprietors often seek the aid of courts to suppress the conduct, particularly when the effect of the conduct is to disrupt or circumvent the proprietors' mechanisms for receiving financial compensation.
The issues about linking and framing have become so intertwined under copyright law that it is impractical to attempt to address them separately. As will appear, some decisions confuse them with one another, while other decisions involve and therefore address both. Framing involves the use of hyperlinking, so that any challenge of framing under copyright law is likely to involve a challenge of hyperlinking as well.
While hyperlinking occurs in other technologies, U. Accordingly, this article considers only such technology. Most Web sites are organized hierarchically, with a home page at the top and deeper pages within the site, reached by links on the home page. Deep linking is the practice of using a hyperlink that takes a user directly to a page other than the top or home page.
The link given below is a deep link. When a user clicks on the underlined text, the browser jumps from the page on which the link is shown to a page of the Web site of the U. Several lawsuits have involved complaints by proprietors of Web pages against the use of deep links. When an inline img-src link of an image is used on a Web page, it seems to be present as a part of the Web page.
The presence of the image is only virtual, however, in the sense that the image file is not physically present at the server for the Web site being viewed. Use of inline linking has led to contentious litigation discussed below. The image at right is a front view of the U. All these files are stored on the SCOTUS server and can be accessed by clicking on the respective hyperlinks deep links. Image links can be categorized in a hierarchy, based on the technological expedient used to effectuate the link, as explained below.
Each further step corresponds to successively lower levels of risk of copyright infringement. The hierarchy operates as follows, using the picture of the SCOTUS building as an example for discussion purposes selected because it is in the public domain and is not subject to copyright protection; 17 U.
An image may be placed on a Web page or made available for viewing by any of the following expedients:. Merely linking to Kelly's originating home page, on the other hand, without free-standing display of the full-size images, would not run afoul of the fair use limits established by the Panel.
Microsoft Bing Search Engine Still Serving Up Child Porn: Report
It is striking that nowhere in [the adversaries'] briefs do they explain why linking could not be constructed in this fashion. Framing is the juxtaposition of two separate Web pages within the same page, usually with a separate frame with navigational elements. Framing is a method of presentation in a Web page that breaks the screen up into multiple non-overlapping windows. Each window contains a display from a separate HTML file, for example, a Web page from a different Web site that is fetched by automatically hyperlinking to it.
Incorporating copyrighted Web content by usage of framing has led to contentious litigation. Frames can be used for Web pages belonging to the original site or to load pages from other sites into a customized arrangement of frames that provide a generalized interface without actually requiring the viewer to browse the linked site from that site's URLs and interfaces. Proprietors of copyrighted content have at times contended that framing their Web pages constituted copyright infringement.
Copyright aspects of hyperlinking and framing
However, framing does not directly reproduce or distribute any copy of the original Web page. Rather, the accused infringer simply establishes a pointer that the user's browser follows to the proprietor's server and Web page.
For a pedagogically exaggerated example of the kind of framing that has incensed proprietors of copyrighted content,  which "frames" a page titled Is Framing Copyright Infringement?
On the theory that a picture is worth words, the viewer is invited to compare the referenced pages to understand what framing is and why it annoys proprietors of framed pages. In large part, linking and framing are not held to be copyright infringement under U. Because the copyright-protected content is stored on a server other than that of the linking or framing person it is stored on the plaintiff's serverthere is typically no infringing "copy" made by the defendant linking or framing person as may be essential on which to base liability.
Some European countries take a more protective view, however, and hold unauthorized framing and so-called deep linking unlawful. The European Court of Justice 's binding ruling in was that embedding a work could not be a violation of copyright:.